#Ship of fools manga tv

Yes, I think measuring social class would be tricky, especially spanning different countries with different class systems. As with all such studies, it's not claiming to have a definitive answer, but is more exploratory. All this info is available from my initial link if people are curious to read it. Apparently the demographics measured weren't indicating a huge difference, but there was a peak in young adulthood and scores are slightly higher overall for females than males.

#Ship of fools manga tv

The second study had a much wider variety of ages represented, and participants were recruited from social media, TV and radio. From what I see, over the two studies, they had particpants from a variety of countries, but mostly Australia, Canada and the UK. The research study (which I linked to earlier) talks a bit about demographics they measured (which seem to be age, gender and country), though I would also like to see more info. It strikes me in some ways more like a logic puzzle, but that is more from playing it again, and repeat tries don't count in their measurements of creativity anyway. It is specifically about divergent thinking, so being able to find any kinds of words that are different from each other. My words are saved when I go back, so I was having fun experimenting with different words, to see which have more or less divergence. Nectarine is a better choice - or kumquat or starfruit. So if you are thinking of a fruit or veg, avoid apple, for instance, as that has other associations (body, because of Adam's apple, religion with association with garden of Eden, and health/doctors, because of the expression 'an apple a day keeps the doctor away,' and also horses, etc.), so will more likely converge with other words. I am finding the trick is to find quite specific words that only have one meaning/association. You can select ten concrete, simple, common words, and get a high score if they are all words not usually found together.

I kind of misunderstood them at first, not realising it was simply about words that aren't usually found together - I was looking for grammatically, etymologically and phonetically different nouns, and difference in terms of being concrete or abstract, as well as difference in meaning, so was making it way more complicated than it is, finding differences that were irrelevant to the task. It also says some people score lower for misunderstanding the instructions. The average score is apparently 75-80, according to the study, so you are not below average. People riding horses may well encounter bridges and mention it. 'Horse' and 'bridge' have a divergence of 76, so they are more likely to be used together - maybe in terms of a horse going over a bridge, or under a bridge. So, for instance, two words I found had a divergence of 117 were 'more' and 'moorhen' (similarities in how the word looks and sound don't count - those words are very rarely used together, it seems, so they have a high divergence). The higher the number, the higher the divergence.

How the chart works is you have the words on two axes, and where the same word meets, there is obviously no score, as there is no divergence, but where it meets other words, then you see the score for the divergence of those two words.